<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slick Domains &#187; Dangerous Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slickdomains.com/tag/dangerous-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slickdomains.com</link>
	<description>Domaining Skills to Pay The Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?</title>
		<link>http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Eslick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccTLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Info Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slickdomains.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today while browsing through my feeds I ran across a post over at Yahoo about a report identifying the most dangerous web domains.  Obviously it got my attention right away.    After reading it, it looks like McAfee has pegged the most dangerous TLD as the .info domain, with .hk (Hong Kong) and .cn (China) leading the [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today while browsing through my feeds I ran across a post over at Yahoo about a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080604/ap_on_hi_te/tec_dangerous_domains">report identifying the most dangerous web domains</a>. </p>
<p>Obviously it got my attention right away.    After reading it, it looks like McAfee has pegged the most dangerous TLD as the .info domain, with .hk (Hong Kong) and .cn (China) leading the way for the ccTLDs. </p>
<blockquote><p>Of all &#8220;.hk&#8221; sites McAfee tested, it flagged 19.2 percent as dangerous or potentially dangerous to visitors; it flagged 11.8 percent of &#8220;.cn&#8221; sites and 11.7 percent of &#8220;.info&#8221; sites that way.</p>
<p>A little more than 5 percent of the sites under the &#8220;.com&#8221; domain — the world&#8217;s most popular — were identified as dangerous.</p>
<p>More spammers, malicious code writers and other cybercriminals can establish an online presence when <span id="lw_1212577992_2" class="yshortcuts" style="background: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; cursor: hand; border-bottom: medium none;">domain name registry</span> businesses cut requirements for registering a site in order to boost their profit and profile. The report doesn&#8217;t identify <span id="lw_1212577992_3" class="yshortcuts">domain name registration companies</span> McAfee believes are responsible for those lapses.</p>
<p>Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of companies are in the business of <span id="lw_1212577992_4" class="yshortcuts" style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed;">registering domain names</span>; some are large and well known, while others are small and less reputable, offering their services on the cheap and with flimsy or no background checks to lure in more customers.</p>
<p>The fact that Internet scam artists gravitate to <span id="lw_1212577992_5" class="yshortcuts">domain name services</span> with lower fees and fewer requirements isn&#8217;t new.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find this very interesting, but also very unsurprising.  My guess would be the low cost involved with registering an info domain is responsible for it being the most used domain for evil purposes.   A few weeks ago Google accidentally removed all info domains from their index for about half a day.  An accident or a test of some sort?  <img src='http://slickdomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No related posts.</p><hr />
<p>You are reading <a href="http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/">Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?</a>.  This post is the property of <a href="http://slickdomains.com">Slick Domains</a> © 2008.</p>

<p><small><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/&title=Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?">Digg This!</a> | <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/&title=Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?">Stumble This!</a> | <a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/&title=Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?">Add to Del.icio.us!</a> | <a href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&bkmk=http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains//&title=Are .Info the Most Dangerous Domains?">Google Bookmark It!</a> </small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://slickdomains.com/are-info-the-most-dangerous-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

